高级检索

茂兰国家级自然保护区社区共管面临的问题与治理路径

Problems and governance paths faced by community co-management in Maolan National Nature Reserve

  • 摘要: 民族生态文化作为各民族在长期与自然互动中形成的知识、信仰、习俗和制度体系,是生物多样性保护的本土智慧宝库,也是自然保护区推进社区共管时可以利用的文化资源。自1996年以来,茂兰自然保护区持续探索“文化多样性促进生物多样性”的社区共管路径,取得了良好成效,但也存在管理实践对民族生态文化的“工具性收编”、正式制度的刚性与民族生态文化的失语、民族生态文化面临传承危机几个方面的问题。本文提出在治理融合方面搭建“传统知识+现代科学”的双轨治理体系,在空间融合方面构建“自然—文化”复合型保护区,在生计融合方面实现民族生态文化价值的经济转化与反哺三条治理路径,以此提升社区共管成效。

     

    Abstract: Ethnic ecological culture, as a knowledge, belief, customs, and institutional system formed by various ethnic groups through long-term interaction with nature, is a local treasure trove of wisdom for biodiversity conservation and a cultural resource that can be utilized when promoting community co-management in nature reserves. Since 1996, Maolan Nature Reserve has continuously explored the community co-management path of “promoting biodiversity through cultural diversity” and achieved good results. However, there are also difficulties in the management practice of “instrumental integration” of ethnic ecological culture, the rigidity of formal systems and the silence of ethnic ecological culture, and the crisis of inheritance of ethnic ecological culture. This article proposes to build a dual track governance system of “traditional knowledge+modern science” in governance integration, construct a “nature culture” composite protected area in spatial integration, and achieve economic transformation and feedback of ethnic ecological and cultural values in livelihood integration, in order to enhance the effectiveness of community co-management.

     

/

返回文章
返回