Comparison on biomass in different parts of Pinus armandii trunk
-
摘要: 通过采集650株不同径阶组华山松树干生物量样本,对比分析不同径阶组内、不同阶组间树干、木材、树皮各部位生物量占比情况。结果表明:华山松不同径阶组内,树干、木材、树皮各部位生物量占比均呈现上部最小,中部次之,下部最大;不同径阶组间,随着径阶组增大,树干、木材、树皮上部生物量占比逐渐增加,中部生物量占比变化不大,下部生物量占比逐渐减小。Abstract: By collecting 650 trunk biomass samples of Pinus armandii with different diameter levels, the biomass ratios of trunk, wood, and bark within and among different diameter levels were compared and analyzed. The results showed that the percentage of biomass of trunk, wood and bark in the upper part was the smallest, the middle part was the second, and the lower part was the largest; among different diameter order groups, with the increase of diameter order group, the proportion of upper biomass of trunk, wood and bark gradually increased, the proportion of middle biomass did not change much, and the proportion of lower biomass gradually decreased.
-
Keywords:
- Pinus armandii /
- different parts of trunk /
- biomass
-
-
[1] 付梦瑶,贺军钊,宋良红,等.三门峡山区典型森林植被乔木层生物量动态研究[J].河南科学,2016,34(3):332-337. [2] 薛立,杨鹏.森林生物量研究综述[J].福建林学院学报,2004,(3):283-288. [3] 程积民,程杰,高阳.渭北黄土区不同立地条件下刺槐人工林群落生物量结构特征[J].北京林业大学学报,2014,36(2):15-21. [4] 何斌,李青,刘勇.草海国家级自然保护区华山松群落特征及物种多样性研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2020,28(1):44-52. [5] 姚慧芳,卢杰,王超.华山松研究进展及展望[J].绿色科技,2021,23(1):123-125+128. [6] 霍达,张喜,罗扬,等.贵州华山松林分结构与碳储量动态[J].林业科技开发,2013,27(3):57-61. [7] 李元玖,陈奇伯,熊好琴,等.滇中高原华山松人工林碳储量及固碳释氧效益[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(2):79-84. [8] 袁丽萍.云南云龙天池自然保护区华山松天然林生物量研究[J].防护林科技,2018,(08):13-15. [9] 曹欣媛,袁丛军,王浩东,等.乌蒙山不同龄组华山松林乔木层碳密度及固碳释氧能力[J].贵州林业科技,2023,51(1):31-38. [10] 林国刘.云南松不同径级组各部位生物量对比研究[J].林业调查规划,2022,47(3):27-32. [11] 侯芳,王克勤,宋娅丽,等.滇中亚高山5种典型森林乔木层生物量及碳储量分配格局[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):29-35. [12] 杨建林,赵增昆.云南年鉴2021[M].昆明:云南年鉴社,2021:23-25. [13] 吴彦奎.云南森林资源年度监测:2017-2020年[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,2021.
计量
- 文章访问数: 0
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0